morbius
Anomaly Investigator
Posts: 139
|
Post by morbius on Jan 25, 2014 5:38:11 GMT -5
What is the difference in these two pictures? What processes were being used/why? What is being presented here ? Are there beings present in this pic/how many/where? What is the nature of the sky lights ? Where was this taken from ? Is there really a skyline ? How old are these ruins ? How is it laid out ? Are there inscriptions present here? Broken machine parts ? What is the composition of the ruined walls ? How or what destroyed this complex ? What was its purpose, and why abandoned ? ************************************************************ Come to your own conclusions here, as I do not expect any answers .. the questions are the answers and when the student is ready the teacher will appear ... not ... when the teacher is ready the student will appear./ -Morbius ********* ******** **************************************************************************************************** Attachments:
|
|
|
Post by Marsrocks on Jan 25, 2014 10:23:45 GMT -5
What is the difference in these two pictures? processing
What processes were being used/why? gamma to get rid of the hidden things in the darkness, and sharpening of some sort to get rid of the blurriness.
What is being presented here ? ruins and a street with earth as a backdrop - some bright objects in the darkness of space above the apparent skyline.
Are there beings present in this pic/how many/where?
What is the nature of the sky lights ? objects - material of some sort suspended in orbit?
Where was this taken from ? appears to be from surface of the moon b/c of earth position and size.
Is there really a skyline ? looks fake - or is it actually an earth skyline intentionally hidden in the darkness so as not to reveal photoshopping from earth location?
How old are these ruins ? no idea - if this is earth could be 50 years to thousands of years. On Moon - could be much much older.
How is it laid out ? square architecture - squares and planned streets in block layout, shared walls - a very common layout for ancient cities.
Are there inscriptions present here?
Broken machine parts ?
What is the composition of the ruined walls ? Probably local material - could be stone, mud brick, or formed block.
How or what destroyed this complex ? Erosion and time. Wind possibly played a part - to explain the missing material. Alternatively, this could be an archeological excavation site, and archeologists (workers) removed the material that is obviously missing within the walled areas (otherwise those areas would be filled with bricks from the upper part of the construction). I would expect some degree of micro cratering effects if this was the moon, and more softening of the top surfaces - unless this is much more recent construction.
What was its purpose, and why abandoned ? could have been residential - similar to ancient earth areas. If moon, this construction would mean the moon had enough atmosphere for residents to breathe - as it does not appear high tech enough to maintain its own atmosphere.
____
Is this an earth ruin superimposed into a shot of the earth from the moon?
Do you have a link to the official image?
If this is really a moon shot - WOW!
|
|
morbius
Anomaly Investigator
Posts: 139
|
Post by morbius on Jan 25, 2014 17:03:54 GMT -5
All: I will not fill a page with more elementary questions that need not be answered, but simply say this,
How many times I have asked for your opinions or help and you ignored my questions?
Why is it now that you rise to the occasion?
Have you read the lesson in Mark 4:12?
I have put absolutely all into good presentations, and yet, as you have rejected me, why on earth then would I not reject you also?
Answer me these if you can or will.
**************************************** ****************************************
This is not an ultimatum, but a chance to read between the lines, to observe and learn, perhaps even to reply .. a reply that is really only a reply to your own inner selves, thus the question .. is the answer. Think on this. Thx / -Morbius
*********** *****
*********************
|
|
|
Post by Marsrocks on Jan 25, 2014 18:59:21 GMT -5
so that WHILE SEEING, THEY MAY SEE AND NOT PERCEIVE, AND WHILE HEARING, THEY MAY HEAR AND NOT UNDERSTAND, OTHERWISE THEY MIGHT RETURN AND BE FORGIVEN."
|
|
morbius
Anomaly Investigator
Posts: 139
|
Post by morbius on Jan 26, 2014 2:36:48 GMT -5
Yes
|
|
|
Post by Marsrocks on Jan 26, 2014 9:36:35 GMT -5
On its tenth day of exploration conducted by the Chang’e-3 Robotic Spacecraft, Xichang Satellite Launch Center has released images from the edge of Mare Imbrium, which was reported to be a cluster of craters. The images have scientists in China startled, and other professionals from other countries turning skeptic. “What we are seeing is a wide focal image of the inside of what we believed to be a crater,” advised Chow Ming Gau, Astronomer from the Ganamede China Observatory. “What has us puzzled is that the image could be interpreted as man-made ruins of an ancient community.” Gau was quick to add, “But we know that to be impossible.” Examination of one photo circulating on the internet, shows what looks like constructed stone walls. The image does not appear to be of random or organic formations, but rather “...deliberate lines, showing geometric construct,” added Gau. www.sagenews.ca/article.asp?id=3387A comparison image here: www.le.ac.uk/ph/faulkes/web/images/earthrise.jpg
|
|
|
Post by Marsrocks on Jan 26, 2014 9:42:18 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Marsrocks on Jan 26, 2014 9:44:19 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Marsrocks on Jan 26, 2014 9:55:17 GMT -5
|
|
morbius
Anomaly Investigator
Posts: 139
|
Post by morbius on Jan 27, 2014 0:59:49 GMT -5
Once again on the mark, and my own opinion as well Marsrocks. I did not consider anything less would be forthcoming from a keen observer such as you are. A competent and impressive analysis and overview indeed. Let's try another then, this time a ' real ' pic from the NASA releases, an oblique view of Vesta's South Polar Region. Although a rather bland and inconsequential seeming view otherwise, have managed to coax some plausible detail from a sample section choosen from near the top of the picture. In this presentation I would really be interested in your take of this view.. Cheers /-M ****************************
|
|
|
Post by Marsrocks on Jan 27, 2014 11:38:32 GMT -5
Morbius,
After studying the image you posted, and replying to many of your questions, I asked you:
Is this an earth ruin superimposed into a shot of the earth from the moon?
Do you have a link to the official image?
Instead of answering my simple and direct questions, you berated fellow forum members (including me) for not replying to some of your earlier threads. In effect, you placed me in the position where I would have to track down your image to see if my assessment was correct.
As it turned out, the image you posted for us was a hoax image from a hoax news site. So, I was correct. This is just an earth ruin superimposed into a shot of the earth from the moon. It is just a photoshopped image.
In reply to that revelation, instead of berating the forum further, you find now that I am a "keen observer" and you agree with my answers, and you want to move on now to study another image before providing us with your promised insight.
After promising to "teach if the student should appear," don't you feel that you owe us some further explanation as to your behavior in this post? What is it that you intend to teach?
After all, you asked us some pretty bizarre questions about a photo that you apparently already knew was a hoax:
Are there beings present in this pic/how many/where?
What is the nature of the sky lights ?
Are there inscriptions present here?
Broken machine parts ?
How or what destroyed this complex ?
What was its purpose, and why abandoned ?
I have been told, that I should know a tree by the fruit which it bears.
"Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves. Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles? Even so every good tree bringeth forth good fruit; but a corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruit. A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit. Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire. Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them." Matthew 7:15.
|
|
morbius
Anomaly Investigator
Posts: 139
|
Post by morbius on Jan 27, 2014 13:06:13 GMT -5
Marsrocks, I knew the nature of that pic in the first instant, but it served its purpose.
I did not berate anyone, but stated an accurate observation. That there is a dearth of communication on what should be a site buzzing with excitement and exchanges of information. Where people are happy to post, good, bad, or ' other ', as you said ' make this place what you want it to be.'
And I did not just become aware you were a keen and analytical observer, this I knew from the beginning, and I do understand the nature and background which prompted such a reply. That you tracked down the source was not entirely a surprise either, I would have expected no less from you.
The point is, we are communicating again, however short lived, and that, simply, was my intended goal. It is past time for petty cross talk Marsrocks, it is time to explore these puzzles of the Universe together, with the joy of study research, commradiere, and posting too.
If this is too great an expectation, then my expectation and view are mistaken, and it is my fault to bring it to your attention.
Fact is, by the time you couched a reply of that nature, it is you who could have answered my post .. but you did not. Is that a fair way to run a site .. with rules for some that don't apply to others?
I anticipate you will not take too kindly to this reply, so will save you the trouble and not bother you or post here anymore. Thx for the posting and good times too. / -Morbius
***************************************************************************
|
|
|
Post by Marsrocks on Feb 8, 2014 9:04:04 GMT -5
morbius asked me: "...with rules for some that don't apply to others?"
Anyone can ask me for an explanation for what I post, just as I can ask anyone the same. Free speech works both ways. Just because I ask a question does not mean I am imposing a rule. And anyone can refuse to answer just the same.
Just to be clear, I have not banned morbius, I have only asked him to explain the purpose for posting a hoax photo on here, and then not admitting it when I asked him if it was a photoshop. As I have said we are each responsible for our own posts, but posting hoax photos and attempting to abandon the conversation after you engage another person on the subject, will certainly impinge on your credibility. But each person is free to judge another's credibilty for themselves.
morbius has now damaged his credibility with me. It is clear he is aware of that.
|
|