|
Post by Marsrocks on Nov 25, 2009 10:29:27 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Marsrocks on Nov 25, 2009 12:06:52 GMT -5
Larger region: Regional images from CTX including crater to check depth contour: CTX full captures vs. MOC at 50%: CTX full captures vs. MOC at 50% and inverted: None of this, of course, explains why "the lake" is so bright in the MOC and so dark in the CTX and ESA images. Did the camera invert the "lake" in the MOC image?
|
|
|
Post by Marsrocks on Aug 27, 2011 10:19:54 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Marsrocks on Aug 27, 2011 10:45:53 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Marsrocks on Aug 27, 2011 11:17:06 GMT -5
Though the ctx view is very confusing - it is clear to me after long study of the nearest crater in context even with ctx view, that the lake is definitely a depression feature situated directly adjacent to an elevated region.
The moc image is more highly detailed and easier to read.
The albedo differences very possibly occur as a result of the ctx shot being taken in a different season than the moc when the "lake" was empty of water or ice in the later image.
|
|
|
Post by Marsrocks on Aug 27, 2011 11:26:30 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Marsrocks on Aug 27, 2011 11:40:46 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Marsrocks on Aug 27, 2011 11:53:12 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Marsrocks on Aug 27, 2011 18:12:50 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Marsrocks on Aug 27, 2011 18:39:46 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Marsrocks on Aug 27, 2011 18:46:00 GMT -5
|
|