Post by morbius on Jul 26, 2013 19:09:19 GMT -5
In the pursuit of anomalies, first take the time to look at what has been done to the picture. If you have taken into account, and bypassed or got around at least some of this tampering condition .. and they all have it to some degree, you may be near certain you are on to something. It is quite concerning to find that not only newcomers, but seemingly seasoned researchers and supposed pros,' experts 'and the like, who seldom mention, are oblivious or unconcerned about this significant obstacle in their quest to uncover, discern or analyze a potentially significant find.
This little write-up is for all honestly searching these pics to discover the hidden truths they contain. Do not then, look at a picture without expecting this unfortunate and unnecessary condition to be quite present. Fact is, the pic you ' see ' is not really there, in the original ... and the original you cannot see .. but at times it is faintly visible, and manageable, with some extraction techniques and training. It is to find these clearer areas that have, somehow, escaped the various tampering efforts, that should be your goal .. and to do this successfully, please .. arm yourself with a few gleanings and hints on how to detect .. and bypass these many layers and effects that have been applied to blur and cover-up these amazing scenes.
I had once done a study to verify Ken's accuracy in a post he had entitled " Martian Tubal-cain working a smithy." This obfuscation break-through indeed confirmed the accuracy of Ken's observational skill .. and provided results that Marsrocks seemed to find of some interest, as to the method or technique/s which had produced these seemingly remarkable results.
I am going to present this ' smithy ' pic, in a side by side comparison to a near identical obfuscation signature in a recent post by Macten at AA, " PIA06917 revisited." Now it is certain, Macten is a good researcher for sure, but I hope this will remind him to pay closer attention to detecting, and bypassing, the special ' editing ' featured in these notoriously worked over pics. There are very real and positive ways to be aware of obfuscation, to find clearer areas that are with salvageable material present, and be enabled to extract some meaningful data from these once pristine pics, and importantly, not waste valuable time and have little or nothing to present without these obfuscation tools to deploy and gain valuable leverage with and over these ever present tampering effects encountered.
Am I " qualified " to write up these little helper studies for fellow hunters? Perhaps not, in this fledgling field, but then again .. who is? This I wish to share ,, so that those now, and some in the future .. may have at least a little text-book idea what to do and how it all started .. ' way back then. ' In the meantime I will let my track record speak for itself in these matters, and hopefully there will be some anomaly hunters who will benefit in some degree from the offerings presented here. Cheers /-M
*********************************************************************
This little write-up is for all honestly searching these pics to discover the hidden truths they contain. Do not then, look at a picture without expecting this unfortunate and unnecessary condition to be quite present. Fact is, the pic you ' see ' is not really there, in the original ... and the original you cannot see .. but at times it is faintly visible, and manageable, with some extraction techniques and training. It is to find these clearer areas that have, somehow, escaped the various tampering efforts, that should be your goal .. and to do this successfully, please .. arm yourself with a few gleanings and hints on how to detect .. and bypass these many layers and effects that have been applied to blur and cover-up these amazing scenes.
I had once done a study to verify Ken's accuracy in a post he had entitled " Martian Tubal-cain working a smithy." This obfuscation break-through indeed confirmed the accuracy of Ken's observational skill .. and provided results that Marsrocks seemed to find of some interest, as to the method or technique/s which had produced these seemingly remarkable results.
I am going to present this ' smithy ' pic, in a side by side comparison to a near identical obfuscation signature in a recent post by Macten at AA, " PIA06917 revisited." Now it is certain, Macten is a good researcher for sure, but I hope this will remind him to pay closer attention to detecting, and bypassing, the special ' editing ' featured in these notoriously worked over pics. There are very real and positive ways to be aware of obfuscation, to find clearer areas that are with salvageable material present, and be enabled to extract some meaningful data from these once pristine pics, and importantly, not waste valuable time and have little or nothing to present without these obfuscation tools to deploy and gain valuable leverage with and over these ever present tampering effects encountered.
Am I " qualified " to write up these little helper studies for fellow hunters? Perhaps not, in this fledgling field, but then again .. who is? This I wish to share ,, so that those now, and some in the future .. may have at least a little text-book idea what to do and how it all started .. ' way back then. ' In the meantime I will let my track record speak for itself in these matters, and hopefully there will be some anomaly hunters who will benefit in some degree from the offerings presented here. Cheers /-M
*********************************************************************
Attachments:
