Young man wearing hat crouching

[ken]

Here is another figure from the fruitful  PIA16453 panorama.

It looks to be a hat wearing young man crouching to move or pick up an object, or a rock or even an animal of some kind.
The person is even wearing a belt around his waist.

[morbius]

Your posting scene here is a good choice ... but kind of weird Ken. The hat-guy is indeed crouching and lifting or moving .. something? I was really getting peeved trying to focus in and clarify this pic somewhat. Thought it would take 20 minutes or so .. but couldn't. Then realized I was being oblivious to the first thing I should be looking for .. and am always hollering about ... obfuscation! Am I getting dumb or absent-minded .. or what?!! Anyways .. went back to square one and things just zipped along as usual .. whew.

The attached ( 1 ) has three shots of your pic. I have put two in sepia and one in greyscale here. The last pic is outlined with a number of ' others ' I noticed ( and correct me if wrong here ). and the hat-guy seems bent over .. a woman .. I think? As mentioned however .. it's kind of a weird scene .. indeed. See what you think.

As always, glad to see your posts Ken .. keep them coming. / -M
**********************************************************

Attachments:

[ken]

He could be bent over a woman, who knows what the morality code is on Mars.

The scene is loaded with other images or figures as typical of the add- ons that the NASA obfuscation team  seems to prefer.

The most obvious add-on is the  moon faced  dozy looking and crown-beret wearing face at the lower center left of the photo that is presented as a faint outline but fully registers when first examining the photo.


(for some reason I am having difficulty inserting an image.)  

[ken]

And here finally  is the circled image is that dozy moon faced human image with the crown- beret headgear.



I sometimes wonder if the NASA censors like to have a bit of fun at our expense by adding silly images to a scene.

I will post something else later on that may shows this possibility.



 

[Marsrocks]

Ken, that ground area you circled in green looks like a two-faced image (similar to the Crown face). The character on the left is wearing a King's crown. The two faces make up a larger face.

If you get a chance, can you put up a larger view of the ground around it?

photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/catalog/PIA16453

[ken]

Yes, it certainly does look like a two faced image.

[morbius]

A fine showing once again Ken .. you're both quite right on this of course. And Marsrocks, for what it's worth, I consider that a very perceptive call indeed. The attached should fill in the blanks. Cheers /M
*********************************************

Attachments:

[ken]

Great work finessing the details in sections of that scene Morbius !

The Moctezuma like feather headgear can certainly account for that strange crown-beret hat that was on that moon faced image.

And yes there are many scenes that hark back to earth based personages of fact and legend on Mars, maybe we earthlings have a close connection with the inhabitants of Mars of the past and maybe of the present too.

It is amazing at how many other human like faces can be detected in a small portion of a photo like this one.

[morbius]

You're right again Ken, when you spot and determine the type and extent of the obfuscation, thus the potentially useable areas, it is quite astonishing what remnant details may be expose to both keen and experienced perceptions./m
***************

[morbius]

Just clearing the desk/computer screen for the next analysis/post/reply and decided to forward a couple other studies of the hat-guy I had worked on. The subject now fairly well understood these may be redundant in degree, but thought some additional surrounding detail and context may be of some further interest to this subject/m

Attachments:

[ken]

I often wondered Morbius?

How come very few NASA provided photographs of Mars ever look like genuine photographs when carefully examined ?


And no one ever calls them up on this very observable  fact.

[morbius]

Ken, the ' originals ' were captured with well thought out state of the art and perfectly working cameras. Which pics, it might be noted, have cost the honest tax-payers billions of dollars to secure. Unfortunately, the originals are intercepted and kept until, eventually, a highly edited version ( to be nice )is graciously provided to an awe struck dumbed-down grateful public .. it is the acclaimed and long awaited ' Public-Releases ' .. and everybody shouted hurrah!

However, as thousands of anomaly researchers globally are aware, and tens of thousands of professional photographers and image analysts could easily demonstrate, these ' public-releases ' would quickly and amply provide incontrovertible court evidence of this ongoing and clandestine cover-up.

Some people are awaiting and working towards disclosure. But I tell you .. that disclosure has already occurred .. in every quality anomaly pic presented and competently explained, there is a witness to this truth .. easily. There will never be a collective consensus with any recognizable clout or presence. Each individual alone will have to come to the point whether to accept, or reject, the truth above. Then, for those who understand, no explanation will be needed. And, for those who do not understand clearly defined evidences ... no explanation will be of any possible use to convince them so.

Even if some kind of Bill Gates person were to put his entire fortune into disclosure of image tampering culpability .. or anything else for that matter .. it wouldn't even get a local .. let alone a Supreme Court hearing. These inconveniences and possibilities have all long been accounted and prepared for in the ( supposed ) " Great Over-plan " prepared by this apparently globally-established control-group.

I don't mean to sound negative or such Ken, but am just presenting my, admittedly long-winded, take on your honest and straight-forward question. I think this has covered the essentials reasonably well and within reason. Would be glad to entertain or consider any counters or additional thoughts on this vexing problem. From you these are always welcome.

And no, I don't pay much attention or have an interest to or in the ' secret-agendas ' going on around this, or anything else for that matter. I have found it is a waste of time and stressful too. So, am quite satisfied to just be generally aware and .. complacent .. I guess. What we can do though, is just continue what we have been doing all along .. and methinks, with some modest and effective degree of success as well. Ha .. just keep them coming Ken and Cheers .. indeed. /m
***********************************

[ken]

Very well put Morbius.

I guess the general public for the most part does not interest its self as deeply as we do on this subject.