morbius
Anomaly Investigator
Posts: 139
|
Post by morbius on Mar 1, 2013 4:24:42 GMT -5
Keeping in touch with this updated pic of a Pharoah ... on Mars. It is a subject kicked around at AA here for some time. Skipper's absense is quite puzzling too, but let's hope for a speedy return of an exemplary person and site .. indeed. -Morbius Attachments:
|
|
|
|
Post by Marsrocks on Mar 1, 2013 10:00:28 GMT -5
|
|
morbius
Anomaly Investigator
Posts: 139
|
Post by morbius on Mar 2, 2013 0:30:09 GMT -5
Marsrocks, hello, and thanks for the reply. Your ' estimating-measurement ' caught my eye and decided to do a little run with it/ attached/ basically you did not zoom-in, and ' out ' of the full-dimensions of the Cape in ' Take Two ', but you say the Cliff is 50-feet vertically. By extrapolation then .. all other measurements should be calibratable in degree. The attached simply ( I hope ) shows an alternate methodology that you might, or might not, find of some promise? I also realize that many may not be attuned to the ' anomaly phenomena ' , for various reasons and pre-conditioning, may have some problem initially in identifying such as ' the Pharoah.'Guess we should just be patient and give our best example and explanations, as well counter questions with the best we can deduce or call upon from others? -Morbius Attachments:
|
|
|
|
Post by thewatcher on Mar 5, 2013 13:40:42 GMT -5
Keeping in touch with this updated pic of a Pharoah ... on Mars. It is a subject kicked around at AA here for some time. Skipper's absense is quite puzzling too, but let's hope for a speedy return of an exemplary person and site .. indeed. -Morbius Morbius... The cliffs average between 15 and 20 feet high around Victoria crater 8-).. Maybe a little revision in ur estimates (advised strongly)/ Cheers |
|
morbius
Anomaly Investigator
Posts: 139
|
Post by morbius on Mar 5, 2013 20:38:43 GMT -5
TW ... your ' strongly advised ' estimates are based on what? As NASA's ' data ', like its photos, are notoriously known to be dubius and unreliable to begin with, we need ask then, isn't going by NASA records folly? Check your sources track record 1st, before being so trustfull .. then, I suggest ' strongly ' you 1st independantly confirm this ' data ' ( ? ) before possibly facilitating and perpetuating more of their lies and deceptions. Personally, I will stick with my own deductions until proven otherwise./ cheers Attachments:
|
|
