THE MOST INTRIGUING HUMAN LIKE FACE FOUND ON MARS

[marsrevealer]

Here is yet more image data.

Mars Odyssey Infrared Imagery X 4

Mars Odyssey Vis Imagery X 3

Mars Express Imagery

Plus MARS EXPRESS perspective views via GOOGLE MARS!

ONE THING... LEADS TO ANOTHER!

[Marsrocks]

The face itself - or what is left of it - leaves a lot to be desired, but it looks like it is on top of a rectangular mound.

Some of those views are very interesting - - especially the upside down ESA view - it looks like some underlying rectangular forms all around it.

Do you have a link to it, or the coordinates?

[marsrevealer]

Not ready to present that yet Rocks! ;-) Building up my case to present... Ya know? ;-) Many wanna know. Not feel like I be pickin on ya. ;-)

[marsrevealer]

[marsrevealer]

This compilation shows 3 image sources, Mars Odyssey, Mars Express, Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter.

[Marsrocks]

Revealer,

As far as faces on Mars there are faces in the natural landscape - which we try to determine if there is some change in the landscape - some alteration from the natural flow which helps convince us that the landform might have been modified at some point in its history to make it look more like a face rather than a random face appearance.

There are also face mounds (or animal mounds)- where an argument might be made that material was piled up to create the appearance of a face or other shape. Of course, we know that animal mounds, and just common round mounds were common on the earthscape in the last thousand years. The native Americans were prolific mound builders, and made thousands of mother mounds, marking the heart of their territories.

Those mounds have been mostly lost due just to agriculture, and of course natural weather events slowly take them away.

I put this in the category of face mounds - though it crosses categories a bit. The face itself appears just like the surrounding natural geology. That squarish base underneath though is the crux of the mound.

It may be interesting at some point for you to make a presentation of these mounds you've collected - and distinguish them into categories of mound objects and non mound faces - that are simply cut into the terrain.

Of course we know NASA has been running to distance itself from these mounds as fast as it can go. Why? Is it because mound objects are so difficult to explain?

The Cydonia face itself a mound object adds a curiosity rarely mentioned - that is the build up of pasted-on terrain on the lion side. How did that different terrain get on the side of the face - what natural event could paste-on terrain to one mound, but leave all the other buttes in the area alone?

In your search for face mounds, have you come across pasted-on terrain on any of the others?

[marsrevealer]

FACE THE MOST INTRIGUING HUMAN LIKE FACE FOUND ON MARS.

www.youtube.com/watch?v=IAhcNFuYJiI

[Marsrocks]

I accidentally came across some evidence for you that tends to prove that Richard Hoagland did provide the photos in the background in the Cydonia segment on the UFO Diaries video series.

I was watching a youtube video about "the Mystery of the Sphinx" and a segment with Hoagland and the Cydonia face came up at about 1:21.25 in the video, when Hoagland says the following:




"The hair on the back of my neck, when I realized that what we were looking at on the monument of Mars, the face on Mars was the fusion of the hominid and the feline. The fusion of this persona. From this, I realized that what we were seeing was, of course, sphinxes. Literally embodiments of sphinxes on two worlds, linked by the fundamental constants of Cydonia, over, and over, and over again."

-Richard Hoagland (The Mystery of the Sphinx 1:21.25).

The image he shows in the video is this one:



This is the same as one of the images in the UFO Diaries background. No doubt, this is an image Hoagland uses in his face presentations!

Now, whether the other face images were real or photo-shopped is another question. But the evidence is mounting that the source of those images was Hoagland.

The video on the Mystery of the Sphinx is here:

youtu.be/qQ-xh3kedW4?t=1h20m46s

[Marsrocks]

Take a look at this - same art used in the UFO Diaries:

[Marsrocks]

And take a look at the juxtaposition of the new or photo-shopped face and the Egypt sphinx. Clearly, this fits with the Hoagland patter:




And this one on the ground looks like a sphinx as well. Same Hoagland patter, and this was certainly not produced by the producers. It could only have come from a Mars researcher:

i295.photobucket.com/albums/mm132/marsrocksmars/face%20mounds/asphinxonground.jpg?t=1359754310
[/img]

[Marsrocks]

And here they show us Hoagland's Mars geometry.



Of course, this image came from Hoagland.

[Marsrocks]

And here is where the evidence builds further.

We have a crayon drawn image of Hoagland's pyramid in a sphere geometry. Now, who would be drawing spheres in a pyramid to demonstrate Hoagland's theory?

Hmmm.



i295.photobucket.com/albums/mm132/marsrocksmars/face%20mounds/apyramidandspherex4.jpg?t=1359754317
[/img]

And in the same crayon style, we have four crayon-drawn face images that go right along with it:




All of these images go hand in hand with Hoagland's theories, from the sphinx, to 19.5, to the pyramid in a sphere.

And some have been used by Hoagland in other presentations.

These are almost without doubt, Hoagland's images, just as you have been saying for years.

No wonder he won't answer your questions.

Either he'll have to explain where the images came from, if they are real, or he'll have to explain why he was photo-shopping the face into other landscapes to make it appear there were more faces found.



i295.photobucket.com/albums/mm132/marsrocksmars/face%20mounds/a4crayolafacesx4.jpg?t=1359755844
[/img]

Ugh.

[marsrevealer]